Think ‘Job-Person Fit’ to Deal With Physician Burnout

Physician burnout in a hospital, health system or medical practice is not a problem in and of itself, but should be seen as a red flag of other problems in the organization, according to social psychologist Christina Maslach, PhD, developer of the highly regarded and widely used Maslach Burnout Inventory™ (MBI).

At a recent medical meeting, Dr. Maslach highlighted some of the misunderstandings about the true nature and causes of burnout, and explored how correcting these misunderstandings can help hospitals, health systems and medical practices enhance efforts to address an issue that not only impacts individual clinicians and whole organizations, but also impedes the quality of patient care.

Physician burnout should be viewed as "a warning that other things in the workplace are not working well," she said. "That warning is telling you to think about and look at better solutions. What is happening here that people are not dealing well with this environment?"

The lack of confidentiality and supportiveness with which some organizations handle burnout assessments, as well as the faulty attitudes and beliefs surrounding the phenomenon that often manifest when burnout is identified, can stymie attempts to tackle the problem, she said.

People often fear they will be stigmatized by saying that they're experiencing burnout, so many people deny they're having a problem and report that they're okay. "People look around and everyone else seems fine, so they think 'Am I the only one who's having this problem?'" she said. "That's what we call 'pluralistic ignorance,' because all of us are putting on a happy face to protect ourselves. It distorts the reality of what's going on." That potential for distortion also "raises the question of whether you can actually trust some of the data" yielded by burnout questionnaires and tools.

The current framework for dealing with the chronic stress that is burnout's hallmark tends to be one of disability, in which the 'solution' is for the individual to quit or work less to escape from the work. The common approach taken by many organizations is to essentially encourage the individual to 'fix' themselves by advising them to get more sleep, exercise more, eat a healthier diet or take a resilience workshop, the implicit message being that it's the individual's fault. "It's not that those aren't good things to do, but they don't solve the problem of burnout," Dr. Maslach said.

Similarly, while periodic assessments of burnout prevalence might be valuable, burnout scores are not the key issue, Dr. Maslach said. To make lasting improvements, organizations must focus instead on identifying the elements of the work environment that can be modified to make it a healthier place that allows people to thrive rather than beating them down.

"You have to look at the things that are causing burnout and how to make changes," she said. "It's a mistake to keep measuring it at an individual level and to assume, therefore, that it's an individual problem, and not to look at the environment in which people work."

Organizations often focus on fitting the person to the job by helping them build resilience and cope with stress. "These are all good solutions, but they don't make the job any less toxic or stressful. So how about fitting the job to people?" she said.

She described six areas of job-person fit that organizations can use as a guide for asking questions and identifying ways to improve the social and psychological "ergonomics" of the work environment. Extensive research has shown that these six areas—workload, control, reward, community, fairness and meaning or values—correlate strongly with burnout.

Dr. Maslach describes these six areas in more depth in an article, "Finding solutions to the problem of burnout," published in the June 2017 issue of Consulting Psychology Journal. "The six areas of work life can be used as a kind of diagnostic tool to identify important job-person mismatches, thus providing a clearer picture of what the goals of an effective intervention might be," she writes. "By 'customizing' an intervention to take into consideration more probable causes, rather than relying on more standard, one-size-fits-all approaches, practitioners would have a better chance of preventing burnout and building engagement throughout the workplace."

The six positive "fits" that promote engagement and well-being are: 1) a sustainable workload; 2) choice and control; 3) recognition and reward; 4) a supportive work community; 5) fairness, respect and social justice; and 6) clear values and meaningful work.

Beyond merely identifying problems in these six areas, organizations should also assess their progress regularly to determine which interventions are working and how to fine-tune them.

The "fit" between person and job can be understood in terms of certain core psychological needs that have been shown to support motivation and well-being: autonomy, belongingness, competence, psychosocial safety, positive emotions, fairness and meaning. "Thus, the challenge will be to figure out how to design and modify workplaces in ways that will support the satisfaction of these needs through the performance of the job," she said.

In a 2017 review article in Medical Teacher, Dr. Maslach and Michael P. Leiter, PhD, discuss research showing that improving the balance of civil, respectful social encounters during the workday can lead to an enduring reduction in burnout among healthcare providers.

Improvements in social work environments with an emphasis on reciprocal relationships between colleagues can help prevent burnout and build engagement, she said. "It has to be more of a 'we' process rather than just 'me' alone."

Addressing issues of job-person fit as a means of preventing or addressing burnout may also help organizations with staff retention. A 2016 longitudinal study of 1,800 physicians by Mayo Clinic found that for each one-point increase on a seven-point emotional exhaustion scale, there was a 43 percent higher likelihood that the physician would reduce their full-time employment over the next 24 months. Each one-point decrease in a five-point satisfaction score led to a 34 percent higher likelihood that a physician would reduce their hours.

HHS OCR Calls for Comments to Update HIPAA Rules
Drug Prices and Shortages Taking a Toll on Hospita...

Comments

 
No comments yet
Already Registered? Login Here
Guest
Monday, 18 February 2019

Sign up for our eAlerts and Newsletters

 

 

Family of Companies Video

 

Please sign up to receive our communications. We offer weekly healthcare-specific eAlerts and MiraMed Focus, our quarterly healthcare journal featuring articles by experts in the healthcare industry.

 

 

Sign Up Now!